Common knowledge and consensus with noisy communication
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Common knowledge and consensus with noisy communication
Parikh and Krasucki (1990) suggested in an informal manner that a consensus does not require common knowledge. Weyers (1992) proved that their model does not permit such a conclusion and that a more general one has to be constructed. Heifetz (1996) gave an example with three agents inspired by computer science which illustrates the intuition of Parikh and Krasucki (1990), i.e., where a consensu...
متن کاملthe relationship of wtc with communication apprehension and self-perceived communication competene in english and persian context
بیشتر تحقیقات پیشین در زمینه تمایل به برقراری ارتباط به رابطه آن با عوامل فردی چون سن، جنس، نوع شخصیت و... صورت گرفته است. در صورتی که مطالعات کمتری به بررسی رابطه تمایل به برقراری ارتباط زبان آموزان فارسی زبان با ترس از برقراری ارتباط و توانش خود ادراکانه آنها در برقراری ارتباط در محیط فارسی و انگلیسی انجام شده است. بر اساس نظریه الیس (2008) تمایل به برقراری ارتباط جایگاه مهمی در زمینه آموزش م...
15 صفحه اولCommon Knowledge, Coherent Uncertainties and Consensus
In this paper we study info-gap analogs of the classical game-theoretic concepts of informationand knowledge-functions, common knowledge and consensus. Our main results are that knowledge is constricted as info-gap-uncertainty grows (theorem 1), common knowledge is limited by the presence of info-gap uncertainty (theorem 2), and that common knowledge is related to consensus via the infogap cohe...
متن کاملConsensus, communication and knowledge: An extension with Bayesian agents
Parikh and Krasucki [1990] showed that pairwise communication of the value of a function f leads to a consensus about the communicated value if the function f is convex. They showed that union consistency of f may not be sufficient to guarantee consensus in any communication protocol. Krasucki [1996] proved that consensus occurs for any union consistent function if the protocol contains no cycl...
متن کاملCommon Knowledge of Language and Communication Success∗
When David Lewis [19] introduced common knowledge, he used it as a key ingredient in his account of language as a convention. We ask how essential higher orders of knowledge of language are for communication success. We find that in common-interest communication games higher-order failure of knowledge of language, while potentially resulting in suboptimal language use at any finite knowledge or...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Mathematical Social Sciences
سال: 2001
ISSN: 0165-4896
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4896(00)00073-1